Calling for websites to remove distractions – for example vaccines, climate change and 5G technology – should be rejected, according to higher scientific studies in the UK.
After researching the sources and results of false online news, a Royal Society decided that eliminating false claims and criminal accounts would not reduce the harmful effects. Instead, the ban could lead to false positives “in a difficult environment to control online and promote mistrust of government officials,” the report says.
In the UK there has been calls from politicians on Twitter, Facebook and other platforms to remove antivax content. However, “denial of statements without agreement may appear to be necessary but may interfere with scientific proceedings and undermine false claims,” said Frank Kelly, a professor of mathematics at Cambridge University who led the Royal Society’s research.
He also said that removing content and driving users away from regular platforms makes it harder for scientists to interact with people like anti-vaxxers. “A more comprehensive, consistent and direct approach is needed,” he said.
While bans that promote violence, racism, or child rape should be lifted, sanctions against the scientific community should not be lifted, the report said. Instead, there should be more to “promote solidarity” so that people can recognize and condemn lies.
“We are looking for new ways to ensure that higher education can compete with online resources,” said Gina Neff, a professor of technology and social studies at Oxford University, and co-author of the report. “This means investing in lifelong learning programs, technological advancement technologies and data sharing methods between platforms and researchers.”
Many experts can act as “smart” to protect themselves from being misinformed and misinformed when faced with it, says Sir Nigel Shadbolt, chief executive of the UK Open Data Institute and co-author. “Most eyes are very keenly aware of the contents, as we see in Wikipedia,” he added.
Some fears about false online development – such as the presence of “echo rooms” and “foam filters”, which expose people to information that reinforces their beliefs – have exaggerated, the report found.
Although the internet has led to a proliferation of multidisciplinary information, many people in the UK have an idea close to ordinary scientists, according to a YouGov study that reported the report. A total of 2,000 people agreed that the Covid vaccine was safe 7 percent of the BioNTech / Pfizer jab and 11 percent of the Oxford-AstraZeneca jab, while 90 percent said people were doing climate change.
Vaccine vaccines will eventually have to face the evidence that their opposition to Covid jabs is wrong, Shadbolt said: “The great natural test regarding the strength and safety of vaccines is the best evidence we have. [anti-vaxxers] the evidence is not good. ”